COURT CONSIDERS PRIMARY-EXCESS DISPUTE
220_C074
COURT CONSIDERS PRIMARY-EXCESS DISPUTE

Commercial Auto

Primary Versus Excess Coverage

Indiana Lease Statute

 

In January 2004, Debra Boboruzian was driving her minivan on the highway when it lost power and stalled. Michael Laux, who was driving a tractor-trailer, collided with the minivan, killing Debra's 8-year-old son and severely injuring Debra. Debra filed suit against Laux, who owned the tractor involved in the accident. She also sued Quickway Express, Inc., the organization that hired Laux to drive the trailer. The Kroger Company owned the trailer.

 

Kroger had business auto insurance with Old Republic Insurance Company (Old Republic) with a $5 million per-occurrence limit. The policy had an "Other Insurance" section providing that the liability coverage for the trailer was excess while the trailer was connected to a motor vehicle not owned by the insured and primary while the trailer was connected to a covered vehicle that Kroger owned.

 

Quickway had four different policies issued by RLI Insurance Company (RLI), the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ISOP), and First Specialty Insurance Corporation (First). The two RLI policies were a commercial auto policy with a $1 million limit and a $100,000 deductible, and an excess liability policy with a per-occurrence limit of $2 million. The ISOP policy was a commercial umbrella policy with a per-occurrence limit of $1 million. The First policy was an excess liability policy with a $1 million per-occurrence limit that applied only "in excess of the limits of 'Underlying Insurance.'"

 

Old Republic filed a declaratory judgment asking an Indiana court to determine the insurance coverage that had priority. The court found that Old Republic's was the primary policy and that it provided excess coverage only by operation of the policy's "Other Insurance" provision. The court also found that the RLI excess policy, the ISOP policy, and the First Specialty policy were the true excess or umbrella policies. Old Republic appealed.

 

On appeal, Old Republic argued that Indiana's Lease Statute applied to determine the priority of insurance coverage and that the Old Republic policy was last in priority. The Lease Statute provided: "(a) When a claim arises from the operation of a motor vehicle leased under a written lease agreement, if under the agreement the lessee agrees to provide coverage for damage resulting from his operation of the vehicle, then the motor vehicle insurance coverage of the lessee is primary. No claim may be made against any coverage available for the vehicle by the lessor until the limits of the motor vehicle insurance coverage provided by the lessee for the vehicle are exhausted. (b) When a claim arises from the operation of a motor vehicle that is used in the business of transporting property for hire and leased under a written lease agreement, if under the agreement the lessor and lessee agree as to which coverage of the parties' motor vehicle insurance is primary coverage, then the policy of insurance providing that coverage is primary and no claim may be made against any other coverage for the vehicle until the limits of that policy are exhausted."

 

The Indiana Court of Appeals analyzed this statute and determined that it applied only to determine priority between policies that provided the same level of coverage, as opposed to policies that provided primary and secondary coverage. The court noted that, "it [was] clear the legislature in enacting the [statute] wished to simplify coverage disputes where competing primary insurers [had] conflicting "other insurance" clauses that threaten[ed] to leave an injured party without access to insurance coverage for an accident." The court also noted: "We do not think the statute was intended to force an umbrella insurer to pay ahead of a primary insurer."

 

The court then concluded that the Old Republic policy provided primary coverage, while the ISOP umbrella policy and the First excess policy each provided true excess coverage. The Lease Statute could not be applied to place the excess insurers' policies ahead of Old Republic's in priority.

 

The lower court's decision was affirmed.

 

Old Republic Insurance Company vs. RLI Insurance Company-No. 49A04-0709-CV-523-Court of Appeals of Indiana-June 6, 2008-887 North Eastern Reporter 2d 1003